Java synchronized method vs block example

Gabriel 54 Published: 12/06/2024

Java synchronized method vs block example

Here is an explanation of the differences between a synchronized method and a synchronized block in Java, along with some examples:

In Java, the synchronized keyword is used to ensure that only one thread can execute a specific section of code at a time. This is useful for ensuring that multi-threaded programs remain thread-safe.

A synchronized method is declared using the synchronized keyword followed by the access modifier (public, private, etc.) and the return type. Here's an example:

public class MyClass {

public synchronized void doSomething() {

// code here

}

}

When a thread calls this method, it will acquire the lock on the object before executing the method, ensuring that only one thread can execute this method at a time. If another thread tries to call the same method while the first thread is still executing it, it will be blocked until the first thread finishes.

A synchronized block is declared using the synchronized keyword followed by an expression that evaluates to the object on which the lock should be acquired. Here's an example:

public class MyClass {

public void doSomething() {

synchronized (this) {

// code here

}

}

}

When a thread calls this method and enters the synchronized block, it will acquire the lock on the object (this, in this case) before executing the code inside the block. If another thread tries to enter the same block while the first thread is still executing it, it will be blocked until the first thread finishes.

So, what's the difference between these two? Well, the main difference is that a synchronized method acquires the lock on the object before entering the method, whereas a synchronized block acquires the lock when entering the block. This means that if you have a large, complex piece of code that you want to ensure is thread-safe, it might be more efficient to use a synchronized block instead of wrapping the entire method with synchronized.

Here's an example of how these two approaches can be used together:

public class BankAccount {

private int balance = 0;

public void withdraw(int amount) {

if (amount > 0) {

synchronized (this) {

if (balance >= amount) {

balance -= amount;

} else {

// handle insufficient funds

}

}

}

}

public int getBalance() {

return balance;

}

}

In this example, the withdraw method uses a synchronized block to ensure that only one thread can modify the balance variable at a time. The entire withdraw method doesn't need to be synchronized, since it's only concerned with modifying the balance variable.

I hope this helps clarify the differences between synchronized methods and blocks in Java! Let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification.

Which is better, synchronized block or method in Java?

I'd be happy to discuss the differences between synchronized blocks and methods in Java.

Synchronized Methods

In Java, a synchronized method is a method that is declared with the synchronized keyword. When a thread calls a synchronized method, it must acquire a lock on the object's monitor (also known as the object's intrinsic lock) before entering the method. The lock remains acquired until the method finishes executing.

Using synchronized methods can be useful when you need to ensure that only one thread can execute a particular method at a time. This is often referred to as mutual exclusion or serialization.

Here are some benefits of using synchronized methods:

Thread Safety: Synchronized methods provide a way to ensure that only one thread can access and modify shared resources simultaneously. Easy to Use: Declaring a method as synchronized is straightforward, making it easy to implement synchronization logic in your code. Good for Small Scopes of Code: If you need to synchronize a small piece of code, using a synchronized method can be more efficient than creating and managing a separate lock manually.

However, there are also some potential drawbacks to consider:

Performance Overhead: Acquiring and releasing the object's monitor can introduce performance overhead, as it involves context switching and locking mechanisms. Limited Flexibility: Synchronized methods are tied to the specific object they're declared on, which can limit their applicability if you need to synchronize code across multiple objects.

Synchronized Blocks

A synchronized block is a piece of code that is wrapped in a synchronized statement. This allows you to execute code within a method or constructor while still allowing other threads to access and modify shared resources simultaneously.

Here's the syntax:

public void myMethod() {

synchronized (myObject) {

// Code to be executed with synchronization

}

}

Synchronized blocks provide more flexibility than synchronized methods, as you can synchronize code on any object, not just a specific method. However, this also means that you need to ensure that the block is properly synchronized and not accidentally accessed by multiple threads.

Benefits of using synchronized blocks:

More Control: Synchronized blocks give you more control over what code is executed while synchronized. Flexibility: You can synchronize code on any object, providing more flexibility in your synchronization logic. Less Overhead: Acquiring and releasing the lock can be less expensive than executing a full method.

However, there are also some potential drawbacks to consider:

More Complex Code: Synchronized blocks require more complex code to manage, as you need to ensure that the block is properly synchronized. Easier to Introduce Deadlocks: With synchronized blocks, it's easier to introduce deadlocks if not properly managed.

Conclusion

In summary, both synchronized methods and blocks are useful for ensuring thread safety in Java, but they serve different purposes.

Synchronized methods provide a simple way to synchronize access to shared resources when you need to ensure that only one thread can execute a particular method at a time. They're suitable for small scopes of code and easy to use.

Synchronized blocks offer more control and flexibility, allowing you to synchronize code on any object while still providing some level of thread safety. However, they require more complex code management and introduce the possibility of deadlocks if not properly managed.

Ultimately, the choice between synchronized methods and blocks depends on your specific requirements and constraints.